?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Freud's Ego And Mine

God, whose love and joy are present everywhere,
     Can't come to visit you unless you aren't there.
       --Angelus Silesius (1624-1677)

i have described this couplet as "koan-like" but this koan has a solution,  The "you" who gets "visited" is not the same "you" as the "you" who must be absent.  Perhaps rhe first "You" should be capitalized to show that it is an aspect of the divine while the second "you" is left lower case to show that it is a thing.  According to the mystics of all traditions i know anything about, this lower case you is artificial, a small self, a false self, a fabrication that stands between the  real you and  the divine essence.  Modern mystics sometimes call it ego. and recommend its dimunition or abolition.

Most people who are not mystics mean something else by ego.  If human consciousness is "partial," if it  consists conflicting pieces, some executive function is required to make consciousness integrated.  Eric Berne's simple but not quite accurate reconstruction of this idea is  that  i am part child, either free  or adapted (id); part parent, either nurturing or restrictive (superego); and part "adult" who keeps peace between between parent and child and, ideally, keeps the child (within limits) free and the parent (within limits)  nurturing.  A strong ego is a good thing to have.

My question for today is: "what is the overlap, if any, between the mystic's ego (the small self) and the Freudian ego (the executive, the "adult").  Perhaps they are totally unrelated and deserve different names.  Certainly they are not identical or one could not be so welcomed and the other so shunned by intelligent people,

Both egos try  to take charge of the whole person.  The executive ego manages the id and  the superego in the interests of the whole person and it can make of that person a saint or a sinner or anything in between or to the left or right.  The "small self" ego knows nothing of the higher Self.  It cares only for its own survival thinking (erroneosly) that it is me.  (Is it obvious that i have been reading Eckhart Tolle?)

"I am the captain of my sour," says the small self, thinking itself large.  "My soul belongs to God" says the religious person,  thinking itself small.  It occurs to me that the captain of a ship is frequently not its owner, nor the owner a captain.  And it occurs to me that humility might be a good quality for either owner or captain.

I somehow need to keep a strong executive ego while getting rid of my small self.




Tags:

Comments

( 2 comments — Leave a comment )
reginaterrae
Feb. 7th, 2016 10:28 am (UTC)
What i think of is the 3rd step: the ego making a decision to let Someone else make the decisions. God created us with free will -- insofar as we choose to submit our will to God's we do well.
bobby1933
Feb. 7th, 2016 04:34 pm (UTC)
Yes.
( 2 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

bobby1933
bobby1933

Latest Month

September 2018
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow