?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Copyright Infringment

I have been advised bu the estate of poet and novelist Nancy Wood that posting her poetry in my journal was a violation of law.
I have reluctantly deleted her poetry from my journal.

Comments

( 17 comments — Leave a comment )
baron_waste
Sep. 9th, 2015 06:47 am (UTC)
That anyone paid enough attention to Livejournal to even NOTICE, is what amazes me.

See, if you'd done like Leonardo da Vinci and written everything backward, I doubt very much that anyone would ever have spotted it.


.em sezama tahw si ,ECITON neve ot lanruojeviL ot noitnetta hguone diap enoyna tahT

.ti dettops evah reve dluow enoyna taht hcum yrev tbuod I ,drawkcab gnihtyreve nettirw dna icniV ad odranoeL ekil enod d'uoy fi ,eeS


I'm just sayin'. Man knew what he was doin'.
baron_waste
Sep. 9th, 2015 07:03 am (UTC)
Or you could have put in binary notation

01001111 01110010 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100011 01101111 01110101 01101100 01100100 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01110000 01110101 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101000 01101111 01101100 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101001 01101110 01110100 01101111 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00101110

but who knows what kind of money-business detectors that would set off in today's America, which retains only the name.
bobby1933
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:29 pm (UTC)
:) (plus a mostly uncomprehending :o)
bobby1933
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:34 pm (UTC)
:) .kniht i .evol fo robal A
e_d_young
Sep. 9th, 2015 02:17 pm (UTC)
Besides the two options above, making the entry Friends-only is another way to handle it. It's not ideal but it's safer, and at least the material gets out there, even though the audience is limited.
bobby1933
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:19 pm (UTC)
Thank you. I have never used the "friends only" option. But i have used the "private" option (i thought) and later learned that others may have read me.
pondhopper
Sep. 9th, 2015 03:05 pm (UTC)
That is incredible.
Good grief...this is one of the reasons I only post friends only. I don't need people trolling my journal which is personal anyway.
bobby1933
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:24 pm (UTC)
Thank you, Donna. I usually don't mind who reads my stuff. Because of autism, i can get pretty unclear about boundaries so i try to be careful. I had probably better learn something about copyright and intellectual property law. :)
cathy_edgett
Sep. 9th, 2015 04:39 pm (UTC)
I have encountered this before and been surprised, since you are actually promoting the work of the person you quote. It is "free' advertising. It is short-sightedness on the part of the estate. I would think the poet would be thrilled to have her work read.
bobby1933
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:12 pm (UTC)
Well, i didn't ask permission. I quoted whole poems. And i unCapitalized some letters because i thought that made the sense of the poem clearer. Also, the warning came from someone with the surname "Wood," and families can sometimes get real strange over intellectual property rights.
cathy_edgett
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:16 pm (UTC)
Yes, it's true that families rush to protect. Yes!
cathy_edgett
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:31 pm (UTC)
I just checked out the Nancy Wood Literary Trust. They are very clear on protecting her work. I think it is a good thing. I just ordered on of her books, so it all makes sense, and cents. :-)
bobby1933
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:41 pm (UTC)
Thank you.
baron_waste
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:09 pm (UTC)



Click for Larger Image


This would be weird and meaningless in 1975.  [But then, much of today's cultural banter would be. The other day I read that one strategy open to the entrepreneur owner of a small business is to go to the cloud.  Written as so, no quotes or anything.  It sounds rather mystical, like going to see the Maharishi.]

bobby1933
Sep. 9th, 2015 05:44 pm (UTC)
:) Mystical, i like; mystigoguery i don't like.
autumnalmonk
Sep. 10th, 2015 12:13 pm (UTC)
Very peculiar, especially here in LJ. I'm sorry that you've had to deal with such a hassle.

When I think about it I can sort-of see how it might technically been an issue though. Publicly posting material online is technically publishing, and I have been told that copyright holders cannot knowingly allow some violations of copyright to exist without nullifying their standing to be able to pursue large-scale, money-generating violations. They may not care about you posting the material to LJ, but they have to address it so they don't lose the ability to sue the next garage "press" that decides to market a "new edition" of her works and keep all the proceeds for themselves.

Regardless, I support the already mentioned idea of just friends-locking posts with lengthy quotations of material still under copyright.
bobby1933
Sep. 10th, 2015 09:50 pm (UTC)
I may be able to post some of favorites among Wood's offeerings under conditions that are reasonable, actually quite gernerous.
( 17 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

bobby1933
bobby1933

Latest Month

July 2018
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow