?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

From "Animal Wisdom."

"The natural sciences have traditionally proceeded from a premise that has its roots in medieval theology.  The premise is that nature is a hierarchy, a sort of ladder of evolutionary achievement with one celled organisms on the bottom rung and human beings at the top.  Even scientists who profess to be atheists seem to take it on faith that humanity is the pinnacle of Creation and enjoys dominion over all other creatures.  This assumption can be a blind spot on the scientific level as well as the spiritual one.

"Characteristics such a large complex brain,  the use of tools, linquistic sophistication, and the ability to transmit knowledge through culture are considered the hallmarks of species superiority, because they happen to be human characteristics.  For humans to come out the winners in a competition for which we have made up the rules is hardly surprising.  But the more we learn about other creatures the more we discover that nature isn't following the human rule book."  -- Linda Bender, Animal Wisdom. p96.


Science was supposed to "think God's thoughts after him."
Well, good luck with that.
good science is based on good theory.
Theory makes certain a priori assumptions.
What assumptions should those be?
What assumptions can they be?
Even the Socratic assumption seems too broad and wrong.

And, that material events have material causes
seems to be receding into the infinitessimalinity
of the  subatomic universe.
Aboriginal legends appear sophisticated by comparison.
To the theories we have to explain our visible universe.

Comments

( 6 comments — Leave a comment )
amaebi
Mar. 10th, 2015 11:07 am (UTC)
If humans were better at recognizing our assumptions, at not confusing our perspectives with the fabric of the universe, I think we'd do a better job.
bobby1933
Mar. 10th, 2015 08:06 pm (UTC)
Indeed, i should assume that my assumptions are guesses.
And that they are likely to be wrong now or some time in the future (and the past?).
And that my guess is not superior to others guesses because of differences in spiritual perspective, ethnic or scientific background or other human variations;
and that no human perspective can be a complete perspective. Given careful consideration to its limitations, science cam be a great tool; But Dr Frankenstein is alive and thinks among us.
amaebi
Mar. 12th, 2015 11:15 am (UTC)
And I think that The Great Chain of Being came from the hierarchical architecture of human thinking rather than the other way round. :/
bobby1933
Mar. 12th, 2015 09:25 pm (UTC)
A "chain" can be stretched horizontally as well as hung vertically; but, yes i Agree and much prefer "web of life," or "web of being," or just "being."
amaebi
Mar. 12th, 2015 10:21 pm (UTC)
And it's kind of nice that Indra was a drunkard.
bobby1933
Mar. 12th, 2015 11:31 pm (UTC)
What?? Oh! Indra's web, right? The divine must be at least "playful," if not mischievous or tipsy.
( 6 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

bobby1933
bobby1933

Latest Month

September 2018
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow